From: Jasper
Date: 30 Jun 2008
Time: 11:35:15 AM
Jean— Knowledge about this sort of thing might be more common than you think. It is no news to me that what “apparently” happened to the Kennedys fits an established pattern. It wouldn’t be extraordinary for the police, the coroner or the prosecutor, either. ................... I believe that Solitairea1’s concern is the same as mine given the “apparent” rage killing of Ron Goldman and Nicole Simpson and the “apparent” accidental drug deaths of Bill Wasz, Stephen Ammerman, Don Simpson and Greg Coleman. I would wager that one or two of these deaths came about exactly as they appeared to. I would also wager that the others were murders conceived and carried out by experts to give a false appearance of what really happened – to mask WHY it happened and therefore to shut down any effective investigation into who might have done it. .................. Like you, I believe (at this moment) that the Kennedy deaths are what they appear to be. On the other hand, there are enough questions in my mind about the reports of the investigation to believe that THIS CASE should not be automatically grouped with others that fit a similar pattern. If it is not thoroughly investigated FIRST as a double homicide it will never be investigated that way. The police will simply gather and analyze all the evidence that match the appearance of a murder-homicide and stop where they started. ................ I don’t think it’s possible, in practical terms, to conduct parallel investigations of a murder-suicide and a double homicide in this case. Murder-suicide’s would be far too common in the collective experience of the investigators and double homicides staged by experts to look like murder-suicides would have to be far too rare to give equal weight to both possibilities. –Jasper