Iago June Discussion

[ Home | Contents | Search ]

Re: Mark Fuhrman

From: Jasper
Date: 17 Jun 2008
Time: 05:10:22 PM

Comments

Bob – There IS a need to make one correction. When we put anything in High Points our goal is to make it as accurate as possible. I had no doubt that you heard Fuhrman's words correctly but I couldn’t add them to the transcript because I couldn’t discern them in the clip. I cranked up the volume and reran it over a dozen times trying to make them out and still couldn't do it. .............Early this morning I was playing the clip again and had to turn down the volume to hear part of a TV show I had been recording on “mute.” Then I heard Fuhrman’s words distinctly: “in Pomona.” It never occurred to me that some things could be better discerned at lower volumes than higher ones. ............”In Pomona” has to go into the transcript. Thanks for pointing it out. Couldn't do anything with "to buy" because it did not come out clearly with the reduced voulme. ............. The Fred Celeni report is demonstrably bogus. You can do an objective study of whether there is so much a possibility that his story is true by making three dimensional measurements of the alleged participants, the space, the physical and visual obstructions, etc. Every real world observation angles from the street gate tells you the observer’s extremely limited field of vision – with the gate wide open. The wounds on the victims in the autopsy reports don’t match the story of the active killers or their weapons. ............... We went through Celeni’s scenario from top to bottom many years ago. The actions he detailed could not have been performed by the people he described, let alone captured on video. The more you try to match up the story to the evidence using objective measuring tools, the worse it gets. –Jasper

Last changed: 10/12/08