From: Prien@aol.com
Date: 28 May 2008
Time: 10:04:55 PM
I enthusiastically second Miss Marple's assessment of your contribution to the defense as described in Schiller's book. It is one of the things that got me started on really focusing on this case because of all the questions you raised about the credibility of the prosecution's evidence and the flaws in the police investigation. I also second her on my disappointment in your apparently current take on the subject. I mean, if the cops framed a guilty man, and the evidence showing he is guilty was fabricated, how can anyone be at all sure he was guilty?. Framing is framing, and no way to tell that whether the person being framed was guilty or not after they get through framing him. The fact is, if you have the proof that someone did it, it's unnecessary to frame himk, and if it's necessary to frame him to obtain a conviction, you lack the proof he did it, how can that be proof of guilt. I am eqully disappointed in your jumping to the conclusion that the only option between refusing to agree to Mark Fuhrman having killed three people is to commit to the idea OJ killed two people. The fact is, in a general sense, it is far less believable that OJ butchered two people with a knife than that Mark Furhman killed all those poeple since he certainly had the know-how to do it. Prien