From: AZCHIC
Date: 25 May 2008
Time: 02:01:49 AM
Bill, thank you for answering my question about your book, although I did not expect an answer from the author. I do have to say that I admire you for the position you have taken as far as corrupt PO's are concerned. I have only posted here a few times, but have been a lurker for awhile, and the main reason why has and still is that I have felt attacked by some responses I have received from the regulars on this board. Unfortunately, I cannot read minds and some of the information I have read is to say the least some what "out of the norm", I feel that newbies are positioned to have to read and reread an enormous amount of posts to follow along logically. I believe that the intent of most of the longtime charter posters if you will, is fact finding, but since not one of us was there the night of the murders, we can only piece together what "we" think happened. I am extremely intriqued as to why you beleive MF did not have anything to do with the murders? Here is my line of thinking....LOL...MF did put evidence at both residences of the Simpsons,I have to ask myself why? Glory is way off in my mind, there is "something" else that is out there and I beleive you know what it is. I am asking for you to explain your answers, are they based on evidence that I could come to the same conclusion from or is it a feeling, an instinct or knowledge of someone else that has brought you to this conclusion. I for one will not insult, riducule or condemn anyone for their answers, opinions, feelings etc.... I am however appalled at you calling another poster "a spoiled brat", and as the man that I believe you are I am asking you to aplogize for that and to refrain from name calling all together. Why? You ask..... Joining in never makes you stand out. Respectfully Submitted AZCHIC :)