Home | Contents | Search Iago Conspirators Timeline Junot
From: Jasper
Date: 4/3/02
Time: 10:25:54 AM
Rovaan,
I'm afraid I don't understand the problem, so please bear with me.
The only way the killer could insure his freedom of movement while restricting his victims' freedom of movement was to get the dog out of the way and lock the gate. He had to know that he could go from the back of the condo to the front without having to worry about anything the dog might do that he couldn't predict or control. He could not risk being scratched, bitten or leaving unintended trace evidence on the scene or on the dog. He also needed the dog to bark loud and long to cover any noise his victims might make and to create the illusion that the barking started after the victims were already dead.
The most efficient way to do all of these things was to let the dog out of the gate and lock it again until it was time to spring the ambush. When the killing was over, the best way to confuse the issue of time and to make it appear that the dog was involved in the death struggle (Fuhrman's dog-bite theory) was to simply leave the gate open when the killing was done.
After the killing there was lots of blood to go around. Whatever the dog did or didn't do with it could be easily incorporated in an OJG (O.J. Guilty) scenario by the first lead detective on the case.
Dose that answer your question? --Jasper